Coupled Jansen-Rit 3-column network
PARITYS1 · dim 18No clear winner. The survival gap is under 10 percentage points and the balanced-score gap is under 0.05, so neither SolvSRK nor the best baseline clears the win threshold. Either works - choose on cost, licensing, or integration effort. All verdicts →
18D system of three coupled JR columns with all-to-all connectivity (W_jk=10). Tests network-level dynamics and dimension scaling on neural topology.
Problem definition
Jansen & Rit (1995), §IV; González Mitjans et al. (2023), NeuroImage
Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.
Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _stable_expit(x):
"""Numerically stable sigmoid 1/(1+exp(-x)), scalar or array."""
x = np.asarray(x, dtype=float)
return np.where(
x >= 0,
1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-x)),
np.exp(x) / (1.0 + np.exp(x)),
)
def _jr_sigmoid(v, v_max=5.0, r=0.56, v0=6.0):
"""Jansen-Rit population sigmoid: S(v) = v_max / (1 + exp(r*(v0 - v)))."""
return v_max * _stable_expit(r * (v - v0))
def rhs(t: float, y: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
dy = np.empty(18)
col_outputs = np.empty(n_cols)
for j in range(n_cols):
off = j * 6
col_outputs[j] = _jr_sigmoid(y[off + 1] - y[off + 2])
total_output = col_outputs.sum()
for j in range(n_cols):
off = j * 6
x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 = y[off:off + 6]
p_j = p_ext + w * (total_output - col_outputs[j])
S_pyr = _jr_sigmoid(x1 - x2)
S_exc = _jr_sigmoid(C1 * x0)
S_inh = _jr_sigmoid(C3 * x0)
dy[off + 0] = x3
dy[off + 1] = x4
dy[off + 2] = x5
dy[off + 3] = A * a * S_pyr - 2.0 * a * x3 - a2 * x0
dy[off + 4] = A * a * (p_j + C2 * S_exc) - 2.0 * a * x4 - a2 * x1
dy[off + 5] = B * b * C4 * S_inh - 2.0 * b * x5 - b2 * x2
return dy- Parameters
- A = 3.25
- B = 22
- C1 = 135
- C2 = 108
- C3 = 33.75
- C4 = 33.75
- a = 100
- a2 = 10000
- b = 50
- b2 = 2500
- n_cols = 3
- p_ext = 220
- w = 10
- v_max = 5
- r = 0.56
- v0 = 6
- Initial condition
- y(0) = [0.000547912097112, -0.000122243120496, 0.000717195839823, 0.000394736058119, -0.000811645304225, 0.000951244703274, …] [shape=(18,), min=-0.000872365487792, max=0.000951244703274]
- Horizon
- t ∈ [0, 2]
Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.
Fingerprint
Spread: high
Default noise: medium
Recommendation snapshot
Clean best: Vern7
Noisy best: SolvSRK
Coverage
14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Ranked on survival, precision, and speed
Versions & freeze
Methodology →- Freeze
- 2026-08-13
- libsolvsrk
- 2.3.0
- SciPy
- 1.14
- SUNDIALS
- CVODE (bundled backend)
20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Coupled Jansen-Rit 3-column network (coupled-jansen-rit-3-column-network)
Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified
Results matrix
Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.
Objective
Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.
Noise level
| # | Solver | Survival | SCD | nfev | Wall | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vern7external | 100% | 10.2 | 12,572 | 4.97 s | 0.861 |
| 2 | SciPy RadauSciPy | 100% | 9.7 | 50,350 | 4.06 s | 0.850 |
| 3 | SciPy DOP853SciPy | 100% | 9.4 | 8,030 | 533 ms | 0.843 |
| 4 | Vern9external | 100% | 9.3 | 10,146 | 4.75 s | 0.840 |
| 5 | SolvSRK | 100% | 8.9 | 30,187 | 1.07 s | 0.831 |
| 6 | Tsit5external | 100% | 7.9 | 12,336 | 2.59 s | 0.807 |
| 7 | SciPy RK45SciPy | 100% | 7.3 | 14,126 | 945 ms | 0.794 |
| 8 | SciPy BDFSciPy | 100% | 7.0 | 11,997 | 1.13 s | 0.786 |
| 9 | FBDFexternal | 100% | 6.9 | 12,028 | 6.02 s | 0.782 |
| 10 | CVODE Adamsexternal | 100% | 6.6 | 4,072 | 283 ms | 0.776 |
| 11 | SciPy LSODASciPy | 100% | 6.4 | 6,629 | 425 ms | 0.772 |
| 12 | SciPy RK23SciPy | 100% | 5.9 | 72,908 | 5.00 s | 0.758 |
| 13 | CVODE BDFexternal | 100% | 5.4 | 6,814 | 465 ms | 0.749 |
| 14 | TRBDF2external | 100% | 2.1 | 29,346 | 7.69 s | 0.669 |
At Clean, best balanced arm is Vern7 · SolvSRK survival 100%, SCD 8.9.
Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →
Cite this page
Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is - a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.
@misc{resonix_evidence_coupled_jansen_rit_3_column_network_2026,
title = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Coupled Jansen-Rit 3-column network},
author = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://resonixusa.com/evidence/problems/coupled-jansen-rit-3-column-network}},
note = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}Related
TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status