Dual-Track Deceptive Jammer Discrimination
ADVANTAGES2 · dim 16SolvSRK wins. At the comparison noise level, SolvSRK beats the best baseline by at least 10 percentage points of survival, or by at least 0.05 balanced score when survival is tied. Use SolvSRK for this class of problem. All verdicts →
True target (6) + deceptive false target (6) + jammer state (2) + discrimination scores (2). Jammer generates false track with slightly different dynamics. Discrimination via likelihood ratio on residuals.
Problem definition
Skolnik Ch. 24 (deceptive ECM); Poisel Ch. 9 (DRFM jamming)
Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.
Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _sigmoid(x: float | np.ndarray) -> float | np.ndarray:
return 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-np.clip(x, -500.0, 500.0)))
def rhs(t, y):
d = np.empty(16)
rx, ry, rz = y[0], y[1], y[2]
rvx, rvy, rvz = y[3], y[4], y[5]
fx, fy, fz = y[6], y[7], y[8]
fvx, fvy, fvz = y[9], y[10], y[11]
J1, J2 = y[12], y[13]
ds1, ds2 = y[14], y[15]
# real target: coordinated turn (CT) model
d[0] = rvx
d[1] = rvy
d[2] = rvz
d[3] = -omega_real * rvy
d[4] = omega_real * rvx
d[5] = 0.0
# false target: CT with different turn rate
d[6] = fvx
d[7] = fvy
d[8] = fvz
d[9] = -omega_false * fvy
d[10] = omega_false * fvx
d[11] = 0.0
# jammer state 1 — periodic drive
d[12] = -J1 * inv_tau_j1 + A_j * _sigmoid(_K_SIG * np.sin(two_pi_fj * t))
# jammer state 2 — adapts when discrimination is high
d[13] = -J2 * inv_tau_j2 + J1 * (1.0 - _sigmoid(_K_SIG * (ds1 - 0.5)))
# discrimination score 1 — compares real vs false distance to expected
exp_x = x0_exp + vx0_exp * t
exp_y = y0_exp + vy0_exp * t
exp_z = z0_exp + vz0_exp * t
dist_real = np.sqrt(
(rx - exp_x) ** 2 + (ry - exp_y) ** 2 + (rz - exp_z) ** 2 + 1e-10
)
dist_false = np.sqrt(
(fx - exp_x) ** 2 + (fy - exp_y) ** 2 + (fz - exp_z) ** 2 + 1e-10
)
d[14] = (_sigmoid(_K_SIG * (dist_real - dist_false)) - ds1) * inv_tau_disc
# discrimination score 2 — based on jammer power
d[15] = (_sigmoid(_K_SIG * (J1 - J_disc_thresh)) - ds2) * inv_tau_disc2
return d- Parameters
- A_j = 10
- J_disc_thresh = 5
- _K_SIG = 50
- inv_tau_disc = 3.33333333333
- inv_tau_disc2 = 5
- inv_tau_j1 = 10
- inv_tau_j2 = 5
- omega_false = 0.03
- omega_real = 0.05
- two_pi_fj = 31.4159265359
- vx0_exp = -200
- vy0_exp = 0
- vz0_exp = 0
- x0_exp = 5000
- y0_exp = 2000
- z0_exp = 1000
- Initial condition
- y(0) = [5000, 2000, 1000, -200, 0, 0, …] [shape=(16,), min=-200, max=5100]
- Horizon
- t ∈ [0, 45]
Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.
Fingerprint
Spread: low
Default noise: low
Recommendation snapshot
Clean best: SolvSRK
Noisy best: SolvSRK
Coverage
14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Ranked on survival, precision, and speed
Versions & freeze
Methodology →- Freeze
- 2026-08-13
- libsolvsrk
- 2.3.0
- SciPy
- 1.14
- SUNDIALS
- CVODE (bundled backend)
20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Dual-Track Deceptive Jammer Discrimination (dual-track-deceptive-jammer-discrimination)
Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified
Results matrix
Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.
Objective
Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.
Noise level
| # | Solver | Survival | SCD | nfev | Wall | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SolvSRK | 100% | 13.1 | 228,051 | 4.34 s | 0.932 |
| 2 | Tsit5external | 100% | 12.7 | 80,346 | 9.19 s | 0.921 |
| 3 | SciPy RK45SciPy | 100% | 12.0 | 64,136 | 1.37 s | 0.905 |
| 4 | SciPy LSODASciPy | 100% | 12.0 | 83,693 | 1.52 s | 0.905 |
| 5 | SciPy RadauSciPy | 100% | 11.9 | 202,677 | 7.32 s | 0.902 |
| 6 | SciPy RK23SciPy | 100% | 10.9 | 176,042 | 4.13 s | 0.879 |
| 7 | CVODE Adamsexternal | 100% | 10.8 | 50,612 | 1.10 s | 0.877 |
| 8 | SciPy BDFSciPy | 100% | 10.4 | 101,472 | 4.96 s | 0.867 |
| 9 | SciPy DOP853SciPy | 100% | 10.3 | 112,478 | 2.31 s | 0.864 |
| 10 | CVODE BDFexternal | 100% | 10.2 | 68,050 | 1.47 s | 0.862 |
At Clean, best balanced arm is SolvSRK.
Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →
Cite this page
Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is - a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.
@misc{resonix_evidence_dual_track_deceptive_jammer_discrimination_2026,
title = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Dual-Track Deceptive Jammer Discrimination},
author = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://resonixusa.com/evidence/problems/dual-track-deceptive-jammer-discrimination}},
note = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}Related
TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status