MoL 2D Heat + Radiative BC (dim=70)
ADVANTAGES2 · dim 70SolvSRK wins. At the comparison noise level, SolvSRK beats the best baseline by at least 10 percentage points of survival, or by at least 0.05 balanced score when survival is tied. Use SolvSRK for this class of problem. All verdicts →
Method-of-lines discretization of 2D heat equation on a 7×5 grid for two coupled thermal bodies (steel target ε=0.95, earth background ε=0.3) with T⁴ radiative boundary conditions and diurnal solar forcing (Q0=800 W/m², 24-hour cycle). Dirichlet BCs at domain edges (T=280 K). Second-order centered differences for Laplacian. Stiffness from radiation T⁴ coupling creates spatial stiffness ratios ~10³–10⁴.
Problem definition
Incropera & DeWitt (2007) Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer; Modest (2013) Radiative Heat Transfer
Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.
Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _ir_heat_mol_2d_rhs(t: float, y: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
dy = np.zeros(_DIM)
q_solar = max(0.0, _Q0_SOLAR * np.sin(_TWO_PI_OVER_PERIOD * t))
for body in range(2):
offset = body * _N_BODY
if body == 0:
alpha = _ALPHA_TGT
eps = _EPS_TGT
asol = _ASOL_TGT
rcl = _RCL_TGT
else:
alpha = _ALPHA_BG
eps = _EPS_BG
asol = _ASOL_BG
rcl = _RCL_BG
solar_src = asol * q_solar / rcl
sig_over_rcl = eps * _STEFAN_BOLTZMANN / rcl
t_amb4 = _T_AMB ** 4
for ix in range(_NX):
for iy in range(_NY):
idx = offset + ix * _NY + iy
T = y[idx]
# Dirichlet BC: edges fixed at T_amb (interior equation only)
if ix == 0 or ix == _NX - 1 or iy == 0 or iy == _NY - 1:
dy[idx] = 0.0
continue
T_xm = y[offset + (ix - 1) * _NY + iy]
T_xp = y[offset + (ix + 1) * _NY + iy]
T_ym = y[offset + ix * _NY + (iy - 1)]
T_yp = y[offset + ix * _NY + (iy + 1)]
laplacian = (T_xm - 2.0 * T + T_xp) * _INV_DX2 + \
(T_ym - 2.0 * T + T_yp) * _INV_DY2
dy[idx] = (alpha * laplacian
+ solar_src
- sig_over_rcl * (T ** 4 - t_amb4))
return dy- Parameters
- _ALPHA_BG = 8.33333e-07
- _ALPHA_TGT = 1.28205e-05
- _ASOL_BG = 0.3
- _ASOL_TGT = 0.7
- _DIM = 70
- _EPS_BG = 0.3
- _EPS_TGT = 0.95
- _INV_DX2 = 36
- _INV_DY2 = 16
- _NX = 7
- _NY = 5
- _N_BODY = 35
- _Q0_SOLAR = 800
- _RCL_BG = 120000
- _RCL_TGT = 39000
- _STEFAN_BOLTZMANN = 5.67e-08
- _TWO_PI_OVER_PERIOD = 7.27221e-05
- _T_AMB = 280
- Initial condition
- y(0) = [280, 280, 280, 280, 280, 280, …] [shape=(70,), min=279.534388521, max=280.469909852]
- Horizon
- t ∈ [0, 86400]
Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.
Fingerprint
Spread: low
Default noise: none
Recommendation snapshot
Clean best: SolvSRK
Noisy best: SolvSRK
Coverage
14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Ranked on survival, precision, and speed
Versions & freeze
Methodology →- Freeze
- 2026-08-13
- libsolvsrk
- 2.3.0
- SciPy
- 1.14
- SUNDIALS
- CVODE (bundled backend)
20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: MoL 2D Heat + Radiative BC (dim=70) (mol-2d-heat-radiative-bc-dim-70)
Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified
Results matrix
Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.
Objective
Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.
Noise level
| # | Solver | Survival | SCD | nfev | Wall | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SolvSRK | 100% | 10.8 | 1,863 | 134 ms | 0.877 |
| 2 | SciPy RadauSciPy | 100% | 10.2 | 1,363 | 53 ms | 0.861 |
| 3 | SciPy DOP853SciPy | 100% | 8.7 | 818 | 23 ms | 0.826 |
| 4 | SciPy LSODASciPy | 100% | 7.9 | 576 | 16 ms | 0.806 |
| 5 | SciPy RK45SciPy | 100% | 7.8 | 710 | 21 ms | 0.804 |
| 6 | CVODE BDFexternal | 100% | 7.7 | 630 | 25 ms | 0.803 |
| 7 | CVODE Adamsexternal | 100% | 7.7 | 691 | 27 ms | 0.802 |
| 8 | SciPy BDFSciPy | 100% | 7.7 | 666 | 29 ms | 0.801 |
| 9 | SciPy RK23SciPy | 100% | 7.6 | 980 | 30 ms | 0.801 |
| 10 | Tsit5external | 100% | 7.5 | 678 | 573 ms | 0.797 |
At Clean, best balanced arm is SolvSRK.
Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →
Cite this page
Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is - a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.
@misc{resonix_evidence_mol_2d_heat_radiative_bc_dim_70_2026,
title = {Resonix Evidence Portal: MoL 2D Heat + Radiative BC (dim=70)},
author = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://resonixusa.com/evidence/problems/mol-2d-heat-radiative-bc-dim-70}},
note = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}Related
TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status