Wendling extended (fast/slow inhibition)
PARITYS1 · dim 10No clear winner. The survival gap is under 10 percentage points and the balanced-score gap is under 0.05, so neither SolvSRK nor the best baseline clears the win threshold. Either works - choose on cost, licensing, or integration effort. All verdicts →
10D Wendling model with four populations: pyramidal, excitatory, slow inhibitory (b=50/s), fast inhibitory (g=500/s). Three timescales with g/b = 10:1 stiffness ratio.
Problem definition
Wendling et al. (2002); Hebbink et al. (2020), CNSNS
Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.
Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _stable_expit(x):
"""Numerically stable sigmoid 1/(1+exp(-x)), scalar or array."""
x = np.asarray(x, dtype=float)
return np.where(
x >= 0,
1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-x)),
np.exp(x) / (1.0 + np.exp(x)),
)
def _jr_sigmoid(v, v_max=5.0, r=0.56, v0=6.0):
"""Jansen-Rit population sigmoid: S(v) = v_max / (1 + exp(r*(v0 - v)))."""
return v_max * _stable_expit(r * (v - v0))
def rhs(t: float, y: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
y0v, y1v, y2v, y3v, y4v = y[0], y[1], y[2], y[3], y[4]
y5v, y6v, y7v, y8v, y9v = y[5], y[6], y[7], y[8], y[9]
S_pyr = _jr_sigmoid(y1v - y2v - y3v)
S_exc = _jr_sigmoid(C1 * y0v)
S_slow = _jr_sigmoid(C3 * y0v)
S_fast = _jr_sigmoid(C5 * y0v - C6 * y4v)
S_self = _jr_sigmoid(C3 * y0v)
return np.array([
y5v, # ẏ₀
y6v, # ẏ₁
y7v, # ẏ₂
y8v, # ẏ₃
y9v, # ẏ₄
A * a * S_pyr - 2.0 * a * y5v - a2 * y0v, # ẏ₅
A * a * (p + C2 * S_exc) - 2.0 * a * y6v - a2 * y1v, # ẏ₆
B * b * C4 * S_slow - 2.0 * b * y7v - b2 * y2v, # ẏ₇
G * g * C7 * S_fast - 2.0 * g * y8v - g2 * y3v, # ẏ₈
B * b * S_self - 2.0 * b * y9v - b2 * y4v, # ẏ₉
])- Parameters
- A = 3.25
- B = 22
- C1 = 135
- C2 = 108
- C3 = 33.75
- C4 = 33.75
- C5 = 40.5
- C6 = 13.5
- C7 = 108
- G = 10
- a = 100
- a2 = 10000
- b = 50
- b2 = 2500
- g = 500
- g2 = 250000
- p = 220
- v_max = 5
- r = 0.56
- v0 = 6
- Initial condition
- y(0) = [1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06]
- Horizon
- t ∈ [0, 2]
Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.
Fingerprint
Spread: high
Default noise: medium
Recommendation snapshot
Clean best: Vern9
Noisy best: SciPy RK45
Coverage
14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Ranked on survival, precision, and speed
Versions & freeze
Methodology →- Freeze
- 2026-08-13
- libsolvsrk
- 2.3.0
- SciPy
- 1.14
- SUNDIALS
- CVODE (bundled backend)
20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Wendling extended (fast/slow inhibition) (wendling-extended-fast-slow-inhibition)
Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified
Results matrix
Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.
Objective
Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.
Noise level
| # | Solver | Survival | SCD | nfev | Wall | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vern9external | 100% | 11.6 | 25,810 | 3.40 s | 0.896 |
| 2 | SciPy DOP853SciPy | 100% | 11.2 | 22,742 | 398 ms | 0.885 |
| 3 | Vern7external | 100% | 10.8 | 26,042 | 3.42 s | 0.876 |
| 4 | SciPy RadauSciPy | 100% | 9.4 | 49,986 | 1.25 s | 0.843 |
| 5 | Tsit5external | 100% | 9.0 | 25,446 | 2.14 s | 0.834 |
| 6 | SolvSRK | 100% | 9.0 | 23,399 | 606 ms | 0.833 |
| 7 | SciPy RK45SciPy | 100% | 8.7 | 30,440 | 552 ms | 0.826 |
| 8 | CVODE Adamsexternal | 100% | 6.4 | 3,536 | 72 ms | 0.771 |
| 9 | FBDFexternal | 100% | 6.3 | 9,661 | 3.70 s | 0.769 |
| 10 | SciPy LSODASciPy | 100% | 5.8 | 8,157 | 136 ms | 0.757 |
| 11 | SciPy BDFSciPy | 100% | 5.8 | 11,499 | 369 ms | 0.756 |
| 12 | SciPy RK23SciPy | 100% | 5.6 | 66,707 | 1.27 s | 0.753 |
| 13 | CVODE BDFexternal | 100% | 5.6 | 5,104 | 102 ms | 0.753 |
| 14 | TRBDF2external | 100% | 1.2 | 26,208 | 4.24 s | 0.649 |
At Clean, best balanced arm is Vern9 · SolvSRK survival 100%, SCD 9.0.
Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →
Cite this page
Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is - a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.
@misc{resonix_evidence_wendling_extended_fast_slow_inhibition_2026,
title = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Wendling extended (fast/slow inhibition)},
author = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://resonixusa.com/evidence/problems/wendling-extended-fast-slow-inhibition}},
note = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}Related
TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels
Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology
Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status